> First, do we care about closing RFEs? I realized that Skip does not > keep count of them in his weekly summary so I am not sure how much > we care about them. Should I waste my time wading through them to > close them? I don't think that's a waste of time. It's good to keep track of how much progress we make in any dimension. > Second, when is it okay to reassign a tracker item to yourself or > close an item that is assigned to another person? I ask this > because Fred has some patches assigned to him that I think I can > close myself, but I don't want to step on his toes since they are > assigned to him. All doc issues are automatically assigned to Fred (maybe this needs to be revised); I don't think he'll be offended if you take some work of his chest. > Third, when does someone warrant being mentioned in the ACKS.txt > file? Only when they have done some significant body of work? Or > does committing even a one-line patch warrant inclusion? I tend to add people to Misc/ACKS for any code contribution whatsoever, including one-liners. > -Brett > > P.S.: Python got to #6 on SF's most active projects. Maybe I am > overdoing the comments on patches. =) No, please keep it up. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4