Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-May/035481.html below:

[Python-Dev] Make _strptime only time.strptime implementation?

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] odd interpreter feature
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Make _strptime only time.strptime implementation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Someone filed a bug report wanting it to be mentioned that most libc
implementations  of strptime don't handle %Z.  Michael asked whether
_strptime was going to become the permanent version of time.strptime or
not.  This was partially discussed back when Guido used his amazing time
machine to make time.strptime use _strptime exclusively for testing
purposes.

I vaguely remember Tim saying he supported moving to _strptime, but I
don't remember Guido having an opinion.  If this is going to happen for
2.3 I would like to know so as to fix the documentation to be better.

-Brett

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] odd interpreter feature
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Make _strptime only time.strptime implementation?
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4