A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-May/035451.html below:

[Python-Dev] pyconfig.h not regenerated by "config.status --recheck"

[Python-Dev] pyconfig.h not regenerated by "config.status --recheck" [Python-Dev] pyconfig.h not regenerated by "config.status --recheck"Skip Montanaro skip@pobox.com
Wed, 7 May 2003 06:42:21 -0500
    >> So, a word to the wise: avoid config.status --recheck.

    Michael> I don't know if I'm wise or not but I do tend to go for

    Michael>  rm -rf build && mkdir build && cd build && ../configure -q && make -s

    Michael> for most rebuilds... I guess I should trust my tools a bit
    Michael> more.

I got in the habit of using config.status --recheck because it allowed me to
only remember a single configure-like command for most packages I
build/install using configure.  I only had to figure out what flags to pass
to configure once, then later typing "C-r rech" in bash was sufficient to
reconfigure the package.  It would be nice if config.status had a flag which
actually executed configure without the --no-create and --no-recursion
flags.

Someone mentioned invoking config.status without the --recheck flag.  I
don't think that's wise in a development environment since that doesn't
actually run configure.  Since we're talking about building Python in a
development environment, I find it hard to believe you'd want to skip
configure altogether.

Skip




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4