Guido van Rossum <guido@python.org> writes: > But given that it's only got a small audience, a 3rd party module > would satisfy the need just as well, right? The audience is actually quite large: any call to <unicodestr>.encode could invoke this codec, if Python does not provide a builtin codec. This includes, in particular, all CJK codecs. Together with a platform-specific codec wrapper for Windows and OS X, the need to package Python-specific CJK codecs (with the size and maintenance issues that come with them) might vanish. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4