> > Assuming the NG label means this is a completely new implementation, I > > propose we drop the current iconv implementation immediately and > > consider the NG version as we would consider any newly contributed > > module at this point in time (i.e. at most two weeks before the first > > beta of 2.3 is released). > > Ok. Given the reported problems with the iconv module, and the > prospect of getting a complete rewrite, I'll back out the current > code. > > This is quite sad, IMO, as the code *is* useful for the platforms on > which it works, and this *is* the majority of the installations on > which it is currently built. But given that it's only got a small audience, a 3rd party module would satisfy the need just as well, right? --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4