Tim Peters wrote:
> [Christian Tismer]
>
>>No, this is not the point. Don't call the function
>>at all, just execute the above code and call
>>gc.collect(). You will see one reference eaten
>>every time you repeat this.
>
>
> Can you show explicit evidence instead of trying to describe it? Here's
> what I tried:
Sorry, I had to re-read your message several times
until I understood where I wasn't clear:
By "execute" I meant exec() this piece of Python code.
I actually pasted it in, watching the refcount grow.
cheers - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer@tismer.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 pager +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4