On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 07:51:00AM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 08:43:16AM -0500, Neal Norwitz wrote:
> > One ref may be leaked the first time gc.collect() is called with
> > garbage (23150 -> 23151). But after that, no more refs are leaked
> > (ref count stays at 23151).
>
> If that's true, then running the 'def' block repeatedly will leak
> references, right? I think from Christian's original message this is
> what he meant, but I'm not sure.
I misread the original message. Running the 'def' block does indeed
leak a reference and collect() has no effect. Similarly:
[23154 refs]
>>> def conjoin(gs):
... def gen():
... gs # unbreakable cycle
... gen # unless one is commented out
...
[23194 refs]
>>> del conjoin
[23155 refs]
Neal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4