On Fri, 2003-03-21 at 06:55, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > Hm, maybe range() shouldn't be an iterator but an interator > > > generator. No time to explain; see the discussion about restartable > > > iterators. Hmmm. Now that've uploaded my patch extending range() to longs, I'd like to work on this. I've already written a C range() iterator (incorporating PyLongs), and it would be very nice to have it automatically be a lazy range() when used in a loop. In any case, assuming you are quite busy, but would consider this for the 2.4 timeframe, I will do some work on it. If it is already being covered, I'll gladly stay away from it. :) -- Bay Area Python Interest Group - http://www.baypiggies.net/ Chad Netzer (any opinion expressed is my own and not NASA's or my employer's)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4