(I, Zooko, wrote the lines prepended with "> > ".)
Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > No -- capabilities (as envisioned for Python) are references. Whether a
> > reference to an object, to a bound method, or to a function doesn't matter.
>
> I should note that this is a new (and good) idea, not one that we've
> previously expressed. And, of course, they are references with
> restrictions, which will be spelt out in the PEP.
Yes. It isn't that Brett missed something and I corrected him, it's that I just
asserted an idea that hasn't previously been posted to the list.
Is the python-dev summary allowed to describe ideas posted in discussion of the
python-dev summary? ;-)
Regards,
Zooko
http://zooko.com/
^-- under re-construction: some new stuff, some broken links
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4