Guido mused: > and that there's no definition of range other than the built-in one > (this requires a subtle change of language rules); it can then > substitute an internal equivalent to xrange(). That sounds good. What sort of subtle language change do you have in mind which would permit this deduction? Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4