Michael Hudson wrote: >Wow! Can we persuade you to try CVS HEAD? okay - i did as you said and the speed-up is only 2.1% so it's not probably worth it. here come the numbers: BEFORE: $ for (( i = 0; i <= 5; i++ )); do ./python Lib/test/pystone.py; done Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.97 This machine benchmarks at 25380.7 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.92 This machine benchmarks at 26041.7 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.96 This machine benchmarks at 25510.2 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.97 This machine benchmarks at 25380.7 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.96 This machine benchmarks at 25510.2 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.96 This machine benchmarks at 25510.2 pystones/second AFTER: $ for (( i = 0; i <= 5; i++ )); do ./python Lib/test/pystone.py; done Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.95 This machine benchmarks at 25641 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.93 This machine benchmarks at 25906.7 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.91 This machine benchmarks at 26178 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.92 This machine benchmarks at 26041.7 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.89 This machine benchmarks at 26455 pystones/second Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.89 This machine benchmarks at 26455 pystones/second -- fuf (fuf@mageo.cz)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4