A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-March/034009.html below:

[Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW

[Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEW [Python-Dev] PyObject_New vs PyObject_NEWThomas Heller theller@python.net
13 Mar 2003 13:39:28 +0100
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:

> Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes:
> 
> >> I don't think the macro versions should ever be used outside the core.
> >> Inside the core, it's safe.  So I think the "doc bug" is that the docs
> >> mention PyObject_NEW at all.
> >> 
> >
> > Better to explícitely warn about them with a wording similar to that
> > from the section 9.2 Memory Interface:
> 
> I'm not in a position to decide which one of these is better.  Thomas,
> maybe you should be submitting the patch?

Nor am I. You can submit a patch as well, and the discussion will show.

Sorry, no time.

Thomas




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4