Greg Ewing wrote: > Ben Laurie <ben@algroup.co.uk>: > > >>If I understand them correctly, a Zope proxy where the security checker >>always says "yes" is a capability. Except, possibly, they may be >>forgeable, I don't know them well enough to know. > > > A security checker that could be easily forged wouldn't > be very, er, secure, would it?-) Its the proxy that needs to be unforgeable. And since their model is role-based, I assume its not a fundamental requirement for them. Cheers, Ben. -- http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html http://www.thebunker.net/ "There is no limit to what a man can do or how far he can go if he doesn't mind who gets the credit." - Robert Woodruff
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4