> > Great! Hope this message has shed some additional light. > > It would be a shame for this to be lost in the archives. If there > were a directory of ImplementationNotes somewhere (or an interpreter > wiki), this would belong there. And responders to "where are the docs > on the implementation" could be told more than "read the source". Good idea. I hate separating implementation notes from the code by more than absolutely necessary (Zope's cobweb of Wikis drives me nuts :-), so I added the essence of that message to ceval.c as a big comment block. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4