On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 17:40, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I can't see that it would affect the functioning of any programs other than > > those which set PYTHONINSPECT now. (But why would they do that and what's > > the likelihood such programs exist?) > > > > Any chance this could be squeezed in? It seems rather elegant: > > > > try: > > something which fails > > except: > > os.environ["PYTHONINSPECT"] = 1 > > raise > > > > (I know we're at beta1, and the programmer could re-run with -i. But > > still...) > > Looks harmless to me. Thomas Heller's alternative really does > something different. Skip can check it in. I just committed this for 2.3b2. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4