Neil Schemenauer wrote: > We have been using Subversion for a few months now. dav_svn is > painfully slow and we quickly moved to using svnserve+ssh. It's not > quite as fast as CVS but tolerable. That would require local users. On the machine that runs the repository, this is not feasible, unfortunately (so CVS would be no option) >>and it is also less convenient, since there >>is no real equivalent of ssh-agent for svn. > > > I take it you don't know about svnserve? How does that help me in not having to type the password on each commit? I was shocked that svn would store the password typed *in the clear*, and in some release even *in the sandbox*. Now it still stores it in the home directory, which isn't much better... If you disable that, you have to type the password every time. svn+ssh-agent would be a solution, but, as I said, not in our case. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4