tim wrote: > BTW, it would be best to Fredrik Lundh's blessing for this, since sre is > still "his" package. I'm copying him on this. on midsummer's eve? I'm supposed to be eating pickled herring and drinking schapps, not trying to decipher C code... > Some version of Gustavo's patch is here: > > http://www.python.org/sf/757624 looking at the patch, I'm 95% confident that it's the right thing (or close enough to the right thing ;-) but reading the unified patch is not exactly trivial; a brief prose description of the new mechanism would be nice. have you benchmarked this on "real-world" examples, and on more than one platform? before-and-after figures for xmllib/tokenize on large source files would be a good indication on the performance impact (if any). (and to be slightly nitpicking, I think it's good style to keep the alphabetical order when adding stuff to lists that are already in alphabetical order, unless you have really good reasons no to...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4