On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 15:07, Samuele Pedroni wrote: > Python is already doing things alright, it already has got the higher-level > constructs. > > 'synchronized' makes sense on methods to have thread-safe data structures. > The rest of Java synchronization facilities should really be used to > construct higher-level tools. > > I think 'with' is very likely a worthy addition. And maybe something along > the lines of: > > class C(object,Synchronizable): > > def meth(self,...) [syncmethod]: > ... > > I'm very skeptical about syncrhonize/asynchronize and implicit locks > associated/able with all objects. +1 Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4