> From: Roman Suzi [mailto:rnd@onego.ru]
>=20
> What about just adding a parameter to try operator?
>=20
> def increment(self):
> try self.counter_lock:
> self.counter +=3D 1
>=20
> - this will save from keyword and could also be used with
> except part with, for example, se-syncronization outcomes
> for some kinds of locks:
>=20
> def increment(self):
> try self.counter_lock:
> self.counter +=3D 1
> except SomeLockError:
> bla-bla-bla
Hmm - so this is essentially the
initially:
self.counter_lock.acquire()
try:
...
finally:
self.counter_lock.release()
but with the condition that the "parameter" to try implement the =
Lockable interface (or something along those lines).
Interesting idea. Not sure about the syntax, but I think we could go =
somewhere with this.
Tim Delaney
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4