there is also discussion at the moment of thread-synchronisation on the stackless python list. people were considering ideas related to futures and csp (influenced largely by the oz language, i think). maybe stackless, with its stronger emphasis on threads, is the place to iron out a really good solution to multi-threading before making changes to standard python? personal opinion: while java may be better than python in this respect i think there are much better solutions out there. i'm a java programmer and in my last project, which was multi-threaded, most bugs came from threading issues. there seems to be a lot of research and new ideas in this area and it would be a pity if python only matched java, when there may be the possibility to surpass it... andrew michel@dialnetwork.com writes: > Greetings, > > After doing a whole heck of a lot of Java and Jython programming over the > last year I decided to work an idea of mine into a PEP after being > impressed with Java thread syncronization and frustrated with Python (it's > almost always the other way around...) > > http://www.python.org/peps/pep-0319.html > > Comments, please send to me. I think python-dev is the right forum for > discussion, otherwise someone will surely let me know and I'll go to > python-list. > > Thanks! > > -Michel > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > -- http://www.acooke.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4