Guido van Rossum wrote: <SNIP> > I've seen a proposal (I think it was in a paper presented at the > second Little Languages conference at MIT, earlier this year) of a > syntactic extension that could be used: > > initially: > lock.acquire() > try: > ...critical section code... > finally: > lock.release() > > (this would block asynchronous signals during the initially: block) > but that's a pretty heavy-handed solution. > Yes, this was presented in a paper at the conference. python-dev's-unofficial-librarian-and-historian-ly y'rs, Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4