> > A simple fix would be to change the seed to use 31 instead of 15 bits; > > we now have a random generator capable of that. Perhaps we should go > > ahead and use even more bits... Aren't we using mersenne Twister by > > default? > > In 2.3, right. Not 2.2. If we want a fix that's obviously collision-free > and can be backported too, a threadsafe counter seems simplest. Sure, but that's more work. Any volunteers? If nobody volunteers, I'll increase the counter range; it's better than nothing. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4