On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Guido van Rossum wrote: > There's also a race condition in the language design that would need > to be fixed before I'd like to have this feature. As you know, the > proper idiom for using locks is: > > lock.acquire() > try: > ...critical section code... > finally: > lock.release() This just reminded me of a question that has been floating around in my brain for a while. Why doesn't Python support the following fully general syntax for try-blocks: try: foo() except blah: ... except: ... else: ... finally: ... I keep having to write: try: try: foo() except blah: ... except: ... else: ... finally: ... -Kevin -- -- Kevin Jacobs The OPAL Group - Enterprise Systems Architect Voice: (216) 986-0710 x 19 E-mail: jacobs@theopalgroup.com Fax: (216) 986-0714 WWW: http://www.theopalgroup.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4