At 12:53 PM 6/13/03 +1200, Greg Ewing wrote: > > Right, this could work (even though in 2.3, the module type is no > > longer subclassable). > >Oh, no! Why not? There'd better be a REALLY good reason >for this, because you've just killed one of the ideas >I was looking forward to trying out. Don't panic. It's still subclassable as of 2.3b1. It's *modules* that you can't subclass.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4