> > IDLEfork, now in Lib/idlelib, uses a new C extension, the 'interrupt' > > module. This is a truly minimal, and generally useful, module to > > provide a way to cause a KeyboardInterrupt in the main thread from a > > secondary thread. I propose to move this to Modules, and make it a > > toplevel module. This is the easiest thing in order to get it > > compiled and built for various platforms. > > +1 on the functionality. But: if it's so small why not simply put it in > sys? Hm, that's not bad. It should be called sys.interrupt_main() then. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4