[Raymond] > > That is a reasonable short-term solution but it should go > > one layer down in ismethoddescriptor(). Append the line: > > > > and not isinstance(object, super) > > [Brett] > Even though it is a non-data descriptor? It seems to have a __get__ > instead of a __call__ method. The problem is that pydoc just classifies > it as a descriptor first and assumes __name__ will be there. Either way is fine. My way solves the original problem and defines methoddescriptor as a non-data descriptor that isn't super. I think that matches what people expect when calling that inspect.ismethoddescriptor(). OTOH, if methoddescriptor is viewed as synonymous with non-data descriptor, then, technically a super object should return True and your fix will have to go inspect.isroutine(). Name your poison. Add a test case. Then fix it. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4