Steven Taschuk <staschuk@telusplanet.net> writes:
> That you think this would work supports my claim that the present
> syntax is misleading. <wink>
While we're at weird exception stuff... while aping bits of the
exception handling code for pypy, I noticed that this should "work",
and indeed it does:
>>> raise ((((Exception,), 'anything'), 'can', 'go'), 'in here'), 'arg'
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
Exception: arg
Any takers for an explanation?
Cheers,
M.
--
ARTHUR: The ravenous bugblatter beast of Traal ... is it safe?
FORD: Oh yes, it's perfectly safe ... it's just us who are in
trouble.
-- The Hitch-Hikers Guide to the Galaxy, Episode 6
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4