martin@v.loewis.de (Martin v. L=F6wis) writes: > kbk@shore.net (Kurt B. Kaiser) writes: > >> 8. Tweak .../Tools/idle/setup.py to install at >> .../site-packages/old_idlelib (with the bin script named similarly) >> so if someone /did/ do an install there would not be a conflict. >> Maybe this should be done first? > > What is the purpose of Tools/idle? Shouldn't it be deleted altogether? I would think so, but maybe not until the new IDLE is working. I'd assume it would be deleted before 2.3 final.=20=20 I don't feel strongly about this. I had suggested to Guido that it be renamed old_idle for now to avoid conflict, and he seemed to be fine with that. If no one has objections, I'll check in a change to Tools/idle to modify setup.py to install it as above, with a script named 'old_idle'. I don't know what affect this has on the Windows build procedure. __ KBK
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4