A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-June/036156.html below:

[Python-Dev] Sneaky 'super' instances

[Python-Dev] Sneaky 'super' instancesGuido van Rossum guido@python.org
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:30:26 -0400
> Bug 729103 discovered an interesting little issue; 'super' instances 
> cause inspect.isroutine to return True since it also poses as a non-data 
> descriptor.  Now this is bad because pydoc then tries to get a __name__ 
> attribute out of it which it lacks because it is an instance of a class 
> and not really a function or method.
> 
> So, should I change inspect.isroutine to check to see if its argument is 
> an instance of 'super'?  Is there a robust way to check if something is 
> an instance of a class which could be used instead to make this more 
> general (like lacking a __name__ attribute)?  Or do we just cause pydoc 
> to spit out "RTM online" every time it raises an error.  =)

inspect shouldn't assume hat just because isroutine() returns true,
there has to be a __name__ attribue.  Unfortunately, inspect is full
of such assumptions. :-)

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4