"Fred L. Drake, Jr." <fdrake@acm.org> writes: > I'll note that I'm not against the idea, but getting the semantics > just right won't be nearly so easy. If someone does the work to > figure it out and produces a working patch, I'll be more than happy to > take a look at it. I felt that the semantics of pprint are sufficiently vague so that trading one instance of "correct" vs. another is acceptable. pprint should be used for debugging output only, where the specifics of the output are not that relevant, as long as it looks "pretty". In any case, I have told Gerrit your ruling; we'll see whether he comes back with a new patch. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4