A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-June/036010.html below:

[Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe.

[Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe. [Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe.Raymond Hettinger python@rcn.com
Sat, 7 Jun 2003 16:51:58 -0400
From: "Martin v. Löwis"
> I'd like to replace the first sentence of 8.1 in the API reference
> with
>
> "The Python interpreter does not support \emph{free} threading."

Perhaps add an elaboration for those who do not fully grok
the significance of "free threading".  This block of text would
meet the need nicely:

   > Any library that *is* "fully thread-safe" establishes certain
   > conventions that users have to follow to achieve thread-safety. The
   > same is true for Python: if the conventions (which are elaborated in
   > section 8.1) are followed, Python is also fully thread-safe. It's just
   > that it does not support what is commonly called "free threading".



Raymond Hettinger




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4