A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-June/036004.html below:

[Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe.

[Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe. [Python-Dev] The Python interpreter is not fully thread-safe.Martin v. Löwis martin@v.loewis.de
07 Jun 2003 19:50:43 +0200
I'd like to replace the first sentence of 8.1 in the API reference
with

"The Python interpreter does not support \emph{free} threading."

Any library that *is* "fully thread-safe" establishes certain
conventions that users have to follow to achieve thread-safety. The
same is true for Python: if the conventions (which are elaborated in
section 8.1) are followed, Python is also fully thread-safe. It's just
that it does not support what is commonly called "free threading".

Any objections?

Regards,
Martin




RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4