Pat Miller <patmiller@llnl.gov> wrote:
> Michael wrote:
> > I don't object to a syntax for function attributes [...]
> I agree that
>
> def sqr(x):
> return x*x
> sqr.inline = true
>
> is about the same length as
>
> def sqr [inline=true](x):
> return x*x
If it's going to look like a mapping, and quack like a mapping, why not make it
a mapping?
def funcname(args) {attribute_mapping} :
...
Docstrings then just become symantic sugar for this:
def sqr(x) {
'__doc__' : '''Return the square of x.''',
'inline' : True
}:
return x*x
Charles
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Charles Cazabon <python@discworld.dyndns.org>
GPL'ed software available at: http://www.qcc.ca/~charlesc/software/
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4