On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Tim> "Scratch your own itch." If you think 2.2.4 is a good idea, do > Tim> some backporting for it; if Martin doesn't, that's cool too. I'm > Tim> going to ignore the 2.2 line in my spare time (it doesn't scratch > Tim> any itch I have). > > I thought 2.2 was supposed to be Py-in-a-tie. I would think 2.2.4 would > scratch the Python Business Forum's itch. Is there anybody from that august > group listening to python-dev who can speak up about their plans? This exact question is being discussed on the PBF mailing list. My vote was to go with 2.3 once it has been better battle-tested and major applications are ported to it. -Kevin -- -- Kevin Jacobs The OPAL Group - Enterprise Systems Architect Voice: (216) 986-0710 x 19 E-mail: jacobs@theopalgroup.com Fax: (216) 986-0714 WWW: http://www.theopalgroup.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4