On Wednesday 30 July 2003 03:08 pm, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Tim> "Scratch your own itch." If you think 2.2.4 is a good idea, do > Tim> some backporting for it; if Martin doesn't, that's cool too. I'm > Tim> going to ignore the 2.2 line in my spare time (it doesn't scratch > Tim> any itch I have). > > I thought 2.2 was supposed to be Py-in-a-tie. I would think 2.2.4 would > scratch the Python Business Forum's itch. Is there anybody from that > august group listening to python-dev who can speak up about their plans? The current proposal in the PBF mailing list is to move to 2.3 as "Python in a tie" as soon as 2.3's stability/solidity is widely confirmed. I have heard no voices against that idea so far, and just a few in favour (in July and/or August most European business slows down due to vacations, and most PBF members are in Europe). How that would play (in terms of time and dates) with the timing of a 2.2.4 release, I don't know. Alex
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4