On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 23:31, Aahz wrote: > No, it's that there are press releases that are dependent on this > release, particularly the one involving Apple. I think that hard-coding > the press releases *now* offers advantages for coordinating the actual > release process, so that we don't need to worry about updating them. > What happens if the actual release slips just one day? > > In the past, our pattern has been that the press release follows the > product release, but that's not happening this time. OTOH, I'm going to let our press release partners know that 29-Jul-2003 is the release date -- if no one objects before I wake up in the morning. I think the press releases can be updated here easily. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4