Thomas Heller wrote: > Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: > > > martin@v.loewis.de (Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=) writes: > > > >> Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: > >> > >>> It would be best if someone else who really uses zipimports would be > >>> able to test it - I really don't want to break anything. > >> > >> Then 2.3 should go unchanged. If there is a way to construct proper > >> zipfiles for zipimports, this should be sufficient. Any support for > >> additional "kinds" of zipfiles should count as a new feature. > > > > It's already checked in. > > Should it be backed out again? > Can the powers please decide? I'm going to test it with my stuff today or tomorrow. I would very much like this to go in. It's had a bug report for a long time, and since it's a *property* of zip files they can be prepended with arbitrary junk, it's indeed a bug fix, not a new feature. Just
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4