Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: > martin@v.loewis.de (Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=) writes: > >> Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: >> >>> It would be best if someone else who really uses zipimports would be >>> able to test it - I really don't want to break anything. >> >> Then 2.3 should go unchanged. If there is a way to construct proper >> zipfiles for zipimports, this should be sufficient. Any support for >> additional "kinds" of zipfiles should count as a new feature. > > It's already checked in. Should it be backed out again? Can the powers please decide? Thanks, Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4