martin@v.loewis.de (Martin v. =?iso-8859-15?q?L=F6wis?=) writes: > Thomas Heller <theller@python.net> writes: > >> It would be best if someone else who really uses zipimports would be >> able to test it - I really don't want to break anything. > > Then 2.3 should go unchanged. If there is a way to construct proper > zipfiles for zipimports, this should be sufficient. Any support for > additional "kinds" of zipfiles should count as a new feature. It's already checked in. Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4