Barry,
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 05:14:33PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-07-21 at 17:01, Tim Peters wrote:
> > [Jason Tishler]
> > > Yup! But, would such a Cygwin specific change be accepted so
> > > close to the release date?
> >
> > If the Cygwin-specific part is (as it seemed to me) isolated to the
> > only line in the codebase that tests HAVE_PTHREAD_SIGMASK, I think
> > the risk is too small to worry about. In one real sense, the
> > HAVE_PTHREAD_SIGMASK patch introduced bugs, causing a
> > formerly-working platform to fall over.
>
> I'd agree. This isn't hurting any other platform, so hacking
> configure for this test on cygwin seems of minimal pain. The
> potential for other OS breakage is smaller the sooner you do it.
> <wink>
Please see the following:
http://sf.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=775605&group_id=5470&atid=305470
Thanks,
Jason
--
PGP/GPG Key: http://www.tishler.net/jason/pubkey.asc or key servers
Fingerprint: 7A73 1405 7F2B E669 C19D 8784 1AFD E4CC ECF4 8EF6
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4