On zondag, jul 20, 2003, at 23:36 Europe/Amsterdam, Martin v. L=F6wis=20 wrote: > "Tim Peters" <tim.one@comcast.net> writes: > >> That's an important question! Since the point of releasing by the=20 >> end of >> July is to synch with some Mac deadline, the point is missed if = Jack's >> changes don't happen. > > I'm not so sure about that. I'd like to urge Jack to seriously > reconsider what work necessarily has to be done to avoid a completely > unusable release, and do any other work that also should be done only > after the release. Don't worry. I'm of a mind to pass on the three bugs in the build=20 process (two seem to be innocuous, according to Skip, and the third one=20= came from Apple but they already have a workaround they used with=20 2.3b1), and the remaining bugs are very localized: in the Package=20 Manager and in the procedure used to build the binary installer. -- - Jack Jansen <Jack.Jansen@oratrix.com> =20 http://www.cwi.nl/~jack - - If I can't dance I don't want to be part of your revolution -- Emma=20 Goldman -
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4