On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 02:29:26PM -0400, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Tue, 2003-07-15 at 18:24, Christian Reis wrote: > > > I've spoken briefly to Guido about this, and he's suggested python-dev > > as the place to ask. I'd really like to know how bad "too much would > > break" is, and if anybody contemplates a way to fix it [*]. I'd volunteer to > > work on the change, of course. > > > > [1] http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=114132 > > [2] http://www.python.org/doc/current/lib/embedding-locale.html > > > > [*] Havoc Pennington, from the GTK+ team, has offered a > > LC_NUMERIC-agnostic strtod() implementation, but I get the feeling this > > is more involved than just that. > > Can we perhaps have a PEP for the 2.4 timeframe? Sure, if I can find time to write it. What we'd *really* appreciate are objective comments on the submission and code, to know if this approach is an acceptable one or not. I understand that evaluating it might require a bit more of the rationale and impact (which is where a PEP fits in); however, for first-time contributors, a bit of hinting and nudging is what we were hoping for. (I'm going to blame it all on the 2.3 release effort!) Take care, -- Christian Reis, Senior Engineer, Async Open Source, Brazil. http://async.com.br/~kiko/ | [+55 16] 261 2331 | NMFL
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4