Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-July/036970.html below:

[Python-Dev] Recent experiences with socket.inet_aton, socket.inet_{ntop,pton}

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Recent experiences with socket.inet_aton, socket.inet_{ntop,pton}
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Recent experiences with socket.inet_aton, socket.inet_{ntop,pton}
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sun, Jul 20, 2003, Bob Halley wrote:
>
> It may be that the right answer is that not enough people care about
> working with IPv6 addresses on non-IPv6 platforms to make doing
> anything worthwhile.  I don't know who (other than me) might care
> about the issue, which is why I asked :).

I'd say that Python 2.4 is the right timeframe to be really pushing
this.  (Python patch releases (such as 2.3.1) are intended to be pure
bugfix releases.  They require BDFL approval to change any features.)
-- 
Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

This is Python.  We don't care much about theory, except where it intersects 
with useful practice.  --Aahz

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Recent experiences with socket.inet_aton, socket.inet_{ntop,pton}
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Recent experiences with socket.inet_aton, socket.inet_{ntop,pton}
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4