Guido van Rossum wrote: > But this is yet another situation where this warning is issued but it > really shouldn't be issued. Yup, and I'm sure there are more. > I'm beginning to think that perhaps we should make it a > PendingDeprecationWarning instead? That should be simple even this > close to the 2.3c1 release. Changing the warning class or removing it completely should be no problem. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4