On Mon, Jul 14, 2003 at 10:25:48PM +0200, Martin v. L=F6wis wrote: > Christopher Blunck <blunck@gst.com> writes: >=20 > > It is my personal opinion that the sooner py is off sf.net's cvs serv= er the > > better.=20 >=20 > In this generality, I strongly disagree. It would be a desaster if the > Python CVS would move before Python 2.3 is released; we would likely > not meet our own deadline. I agree. I'm not arguing for moving prior to the 2.3 release. It would = have to be done after to avoid downtime. -c --=20 17:00:00 up 59 days, 6:35, 10 users, load average: 0.41, 0.25, 0.15
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4