On Thu, Jul 10, 2003, John J Lee wrote: > > Actually, how late is it possible to be in the release cycle and still get > something like this in? And, more importantly, do people have an opinion > on whether cookie support is appropriate in the standard library? My code > is rather long -- is that a problem, if I'm prepared to maintain it > myself? For various reasons, it'll get shorter than it is ATM, but it's > unavoidably complicated if you want to get it right, I'm afraid. Brand new module? Never after first beta, probably best to make sure it's ready at least a month before first beta. > BTW, anybody know how to follow-up to a thread when you don't have the > original message in your mail client? If you've got the Message-ID, just stick in the References: line (like a netnews post). -- Aahz (aahz@pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "Not everything in life has a clue in front of it...." --JMS
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4