"Zooko" <zooko@zooko.com> writes: > tarball, and the patch isn't accepted by the upstream maintainers > before it starts to conflict with their current version, then I'm > more likely to drop it instead of manually updating it to apply to > the latest tarball. It's not that the readonly CVS is completely inoperable - my updates on pserver usually get through just fine, if they start at all, and I never need to repeat the cvs up command more than 100 times before it starts. So if you want to maintain pending patches, using the pserver CVS is definitely the right thing to do. I'd expect that you would do a cvs up once a week or so, which should be managable even with the current problems. I have a number of patches sitting in such a sandbox myself, and I have no plans of abandoning that sandbox. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4