Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > Off the top of my head, i only see two things that would have to > be fixed to turn Python into a capability-secure system: > > 1. Access to each object is limited to its declared exposed > interface; no introspection allowed. > > 2. No global namespace of modules (sys.modules etc.). > > If there is willingness to consider a "secure mode" for Python > in which these two things are enforced, i would be interested > in making it happen. FWIW, I think that would be a useful model. Neil
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4