On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Brett Cannon wrote: >[Guido van Rossum] > >> What's still missing is a way to add formal parameters to the thunk -- >> I presume that J and K are evaluated before interface.interface is >> called. The thunk syntax could be extended to allow this; maybe this >> can too. E.g.: >> >> e:(x, y): >> S >> > >Would something along the lines of:: > > foo = e(x,y):: > S What about: foo = e: : x,y S ? Or something like above but with some keyword: foo = e: with x,y S or foo = e: for x,y S (where 'with' or 'for' are like global) Any other thing in the same line with "foo = e" are not nice, IMHO. Sincerely yours, Roman Suzi -- rnd@onego.ru =\= My AI powered by Linux RedHat 7.3
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4