From: "Raymond Hettinger" <python@rcn.com> To: "Greg Ewing" <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>; <python-dev@python.org> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 11:34 PM Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] Extended Function syntax > From: "Greg Ewing" <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz> > > > How about > > > > > > foo = property: > > > ... > > > > That looks quite nice to me, if it can be parsed... > > +1 This is cleanest of ideas presented so far. you mean the syntax? (because the sematics is quite up in the air). do you see it like foo = lambda: ... because I could sympathize with tha line of reasoning? still one is a statement and the other is an expression and that could be confusing.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4